South Africa's performance in the recent World Bowls tournament in New Zealand does not augur too well for the future, even if the women's triples side won gold and the men's fours achieved a bronze.
The selectors probably think they sent the best side to the tournament, but the results seem to show otherwise.
So what's the real problem - too much practice, reaching peak at the wrong time, strange greens in another country, poor discipline (I've heard that given as one of the reasons) or was it just poor selection?
In general, I am of the opinion that experience must not be over looked when selecting for the higher level, SA or Provincials, even Club first teams.
Being young has its own advantages, i.e. health and eyesight, however, mature players have the advantage of experience, which can be called BMT, "Seen it Done it before".
Mature players, have less fear of failure and this can and does influence decision making and consistent play.
Pick current form players first, then experience and don't experiment at the highest level, do that at the African Games etc.
Why not create an under 40 Protea side?
I couldn't agree more with Arnold Muscat, on his comments about selection of teams for S.A. The selectors choose a team usually based on record, but there are some other important criteria to be considered. One of the main considerations, is to determine what surfaces the tournament is going to played on and then select players who are competent on those surfaces, eg. fast greens or slow greens, indoor or outdoor......horses for courses. Types of bowls to be used on those surfaces is also vitally important. Many years ago, the thinking was to practise, practise, practise together as a team at least 9 months before the event. This would build team spirit, create cohesion amongst the players, iron out any personal issues any player may have and also develop the friendships and camaradieship which is so vital to their success. This was a formula which worked, so why the change? Ever since the powers that be have decided to send the S.A.squads to the Sports Science Institute in Pretoria, the results have been disappointing. Is there a reason for this? The cost of this exercise is also exhorbitant, even though the Government or Lotto assists with the payment of these bills? The squad players are given a gym routine to follow in their own time and it was evident that some players were dedicated to this programme and others weren't. Where was the commitment? Teamwork always requires the complete dedication and commitment of all in that team, otherwise cracks will appear. I believe it is important to include at least 3 or 4 experienced players, with a newer player or players, who could be moulded into the stars of the future. South Africa has good bowlers, but it is the experience gained from the mature players which will assist in making these good bowlers, GREAT bowlers. These players should have the ability to play in all positions and be totally versatile. No one player should dominate over others......all to be equal, with equal input and opinions. Another important aspect of selection is behaviour, both on and off the greens. These players have to be ambassadors of the game and the country.
The suggestion of an under 40 S.A. team is wonderful......it's good to have the thoughts and opinions of the younger players. They are not in the same mould as the older bowlers and could come up with innovative ideas and methods......lovely to see this.
This is just my humble opinion, for what it's worth and I am appreciative of the fact that we have this forum to air our views.[/font]
In general, I am of the opinion that experience must not be over looked when selecting for the higher level, SA or Provincials, even Club first teams.
Being young has its own advantages, i.e. health and eyesight, however, mature players have the advantage of experience, which can be called BMT, "Seen it Done it before".
Mature players, have less fear of failure and this can and does influence decision making and consistent play.
Pick current form players first, then experience and don't experiment at the highest level, do that at the African Games etc.
Why not create an under 40 Protea side?
[/quote]
Stunning opinion Kevin. Could not say it any better.
Thanks for the forum John. It's nice to read opinions/suggestions from players who know WHAT they talking about.
Keep it up.
There is some useful information in Wades' reply and here's hoping that selectors take note of areas that are pertinent to their club/province/country. I was particularly interested in the phrase techniques applicable in certain scenarios. Openness with players is crucial and shows confidence in their selection decisions. The humility to admit a wrong decision and make the necessary changes is also an essential element of a selectors makeup.
ERPM Bowling Club in the EGB region has brought in an interesting innovation: After every league game the Ladies selectors call a meeting of ALL available Ladies league players and discuss the days play - every lady is encouraged to have her say, no matter how controversial. The openness has brought dramatic results;
1. There is no more behind-the-scenes "bitchiness".
2. Players have confidence in their selectors.
3. The selectors have on-the-spot feedback of their selections and the current thinking and mood of their players.